Anthony James Pitt was jailed for 17 years in December 1999 for luring a Ballarat schoolgirl, 16, into an underground dungeon and repeatedly raping her over 19 hours in November 1998.
Pitt, now 51, appeared in the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal via video link this morning claiming police had discriminated against him during and after his arrest.
He alleged police told fellow prisoners at the Ballarat holding cells he raped teenagers, and asked them if they would like to spit in his food.
He claimed that when he asked for water, he was provided with a cup and told to drink out of the toilet.
He said he was forced to sign a statement admitting to rape and false imprisonment under duress, was not read his rights, and was not given the opportunity to appoint his own lawyer.
I am BEYOND OUTRAGED at the idea of this man daring to object to alleged mistreatment that is against the law before the appropriate tribunal.
Listen, Pitt, you evil, Evil, EVIL psycho, I don't care whether you have an argument that your conviction was based on a statement that was coerced out of you and may therefore have been wrong; I don't care whether the police allegedly behaved in an outrageously inhumane way - the fact of the matter is that a court found you guilty, and that means we can do whatever we like to you. Ha ha ha.
Unfortunately, the Herald Sun declined to give us readers a poll on the subject of just what else we should be allowed to do to you rather than finding out whether there's any merit to your claims or not, so I'll do it here. Enjoy! Let your most psychotic imaginations run wild!
Apparently this will be cathartic for many of you. Of course, people who believe in the rule of law and civilised and regulated punishment by the state will find no options representing their views in the poll above, and rightly so - suck shit, you criminal-loving sickos.
I'll leave you with the wise words of a politician not in any way making a cynical cheap shot for political gain:
Shadow Attorney-General Robert Clark said the victim would be entitled to feel insulted by Pitt's legal move.
So very insulted. Why aren't victims entitled to know that criminals have lost all their rights whatsoever so they can't complain no matter what we do to them?
Where's the justice in that?
